Political Science Professor Weighs In After Presidential Debate

Expert Analysis and Insights on the Candidates' Performances

The first presidential debate of the 2020 election cycle took place on Tuesday, September 29th. The debate was highly anticipated and watched by millions of Americans. In the aftermath of the debate, political science professors and analysts have been weighing in on the candidates' performances.

Professor's Assessment of the Candidates

Dr. David Schultz, a political science professor at the University of Minnesota, said that he thought both candidates performed well in the debate. However, he noted that Biden was more polished and experienced, while Trump was more aggressive and combative.

Dr. Schultz also said that he thought Biden did a better job of appealing to a broader range of voters, while Trump's performance was more likely to appeal to his base.

Impact of the Debate on the Election

It is difficult to say definitively what impact the debate will have on the election. However, Dr. Schultz said that he thinks the debate will help Biden because it showed him to be a competent and experienced leader.

Dr. Schultz also said that he thinks the debate will hurt Trump because it showed him to be more erratic and combative than Biden.

Conclusion

The first presidential debate of the 2020 election cycle was a highly anticipated event. In the aftermath of the debate, political science professors and analysts have been weighing in on the candidates' performances. Most experts agree that Biden performed well in the debate, while Trump's performance was more likely to appeal to his base.